ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DNW Round 9 error

To: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>,
Subject: Re: DNW Round 9 error
From: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@attbi.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 14:19:37 -0700
I've just sent a correction to Jerry M...somehow some of the ascii text got
lost. It will be fixed as soon as Jerry finds a moment. In the printed
results, it's correct, and that's what I was looking at.
--Pat K

----------
>From: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>
>To: Matthew Rehrer <mrehrer@rehrer.com>
>Cc: Pat Kelly <lollipop487@attbi.com>, ba-autox@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: DNW Round 9 error
>Date: Tue, May 28, 2002, 2:18 PM
>

> Matthew is correct.  Manny's 51.258 is listed in the 3rd raw time
> column.  His indexed time is listed as 39.930...
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:56:18PM -0700, Matthew Rehrer wrote:
>> > From: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@attbi.com>
>> > Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 13:13:55 -0700
>> > To: Matthew Rehrer <mrehrer@rehrer.com>
>> > Cc: ba-autox@autox.team.net
>> > Subject: Re: DNW Round 9 error
>> >
>> > Manny's 51 is his indexed time. The first three are real-time times. THe
>> > indexed times are used for ranking in each class, and you'll note that to
>> > the right, there are two columns, the first shows overall in real time, the
>> > second and final column shows indexed overall. Manny was 150th overall real
>> > time and 85th indexed times.
>>
>> Actually on the web he shows as fastest overall period.
>>
>> If you want to see what I am seeing you could look at:
>>
>> http://www.rehrer.com/racing/fast.jpg
>>
>> or
>>
>> http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/Results/2002/Championship/round9.html
>>
>> Unless it changes...
>>
>> His other times are quite good too...but not wholly improbable...
>>
>> Take care
>>
>> Matthew
>
> --
>
> john@idsfa.net                                              John Stimson
> http://www.idsfa.net/~john/                              HMC Physics '94

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>