On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Rich Urschel wrote:
> Kevin Stevens wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Rich Urschel wrote:
> >
> > > In theory, the competitor is supposed to have the correct
> > > class on their car and tech inspection is supposed to check
> > > it.
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > 3.3.3 ..."Safety inspection is not concerned with the legality of a car.
> > The organizing Region may at its discretion provide an advisory inspection
> > for vehicle classification and legality, in connection with technical
> > inspection."
>
> I was not addressing class legality, only the need to properly
> display correct numbers and class letters on the car.
> Correct in this context is simply the class entered.
> I was once temporarily failed at tech in Sacramento for
> having no class letters on the car, so I think it fair of
> me to assume that Sacramento performs this check.
>
> Rich Urschel
Sorry, read "it" as referring to "correct class". I hate indefinite
pronouns. Actually, I'm not much fond of English at all, which is
unfortunate as it's the only language I'm fluent in.
KeS
|