ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Divisional Entries

To: Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net
Subject: Re: Divisional Entries
From: craig boyle <craig_autox@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Well, b), was particularly amusing.  I was thinking of
you sitting in a cube, fielding customer service calls
from SFR members with your customary wit. 

It really brought a smile to my face and another ray
of sunshine to the day.

Thanks

Craig


--- Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net wrote:
> No, I didn't.  Which of my points did you find
> humorous?
> 
> KeS
> 
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, craig boyle wrote:
> 
> > You forgot the smiley face indicating that your
> post
> > was humor, Kevin.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > --- Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, craig boyle wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --- Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net wrote:
> > > > > I seem to recall people complaining whenever
> the
> > > > > Divisional is a SFR event
> > > > > because they don't like getting beaten by
> > > outside
> > > > > talent.  (I personally
> > > > > regard this as a rather provincial attitude,
> but
> > > am
> > > > > reporting it for what
> > > > > it's worth.)  You'd have to do something
> like
> > > Craig
> > > > > suggested by taking
> > > > > out the non-SFR members to satisfy that
> > > contingent.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Try thinking "customer focused", if people
> don't
> > > show
> > > > at divisionals, let's try and encourage them
> to do
> > > so
> > > > instead of calling them "provincial".  If
> strong
> > > > opposition shows up, the div is a de-facto
> points
> > > > drop, therefore eliminate non-SFR people for
> that
> > > one
> > > > event from the points.
> > > >
> > > > ... of course, Pat and Jerry might not like
> this
> > > > complication to much :-)
> > >
> > > a)  I'm not interested (at this point) in
> increasing
> > > Divisional
> > > attendance.
> > >
> > > b)  I'm not a customer service representative
> for
> > > SFR, and am under no
> > > obligation to behave as one.
> > >
> > > c)  I didn't call the people provincial, I
> called
> > > the perspective
> > > provincial.
> > >
> > > d)  You put the people to be MOST concerned
> about
> > > (those doing the
> > > actual work) as an afterthought.  I disagree
> > > strongly with that attitude.
> > >
> > > e)  Don't tell me what to think.
> > >
> > > KeS
> > Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and
> more.
> > http://buzz.yahoo.com/
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>