To: | Rocky Entriken <rocky@tri.net>, autox@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Hard & Set rules vs. Comfort & Convience interpretation |
From: | Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net> |
Date: | Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:09:32 -0500 |
Actually, why can't a person have velcro? Heck, if ya flip the car, you'll stay in the seat. The stuff is probably more expensive than a safety harness. :^) Seems like C&C. It is a fabric. Do we head down the path of what "is" fabric? Matt Murray ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net> > IMHO, under this you are permitted. Different seat upholstery materials > [except maybe Velcro :-) ] do not affect performance/handling. > --Rocky |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals, Rick Cone |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Hard & Set rules vs. Comfort & Convience interpretation, Matt Murray |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Hard & Set rules vs. Comfort & Convience interpretation, Rocky Entriken |
Next by Thread: | Re: Hard & Set rules vs. Comfort & Convience interpretation, Matt Murray |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |