| To: | autox@autox.team.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Hard & Set rules vs. Comfort & Convience interpretation |
| From: | Craig & Cynthia Naylor <magazine@pacbell.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:05:08 -0800 |
Sorry left a few important details out, I'm on digest so I don't know if anyone has answered yet. I run in GS, leather was a stand alone option. (one of only three available, on a '91 3dr Integra GS: Floor mats, Mud flaps, Leather) I have the other two, but remove the floor mats for safety reasons, per the rule book. - Cynthia & Craig Naylor Naylor & Naylor ph/fax 858-679-3754 E-mail - Magazine@pacbell.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Hard & Set rules vs. Comfort & Convience interpretation, Smokerbros |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | probably an easy wheel question, Carson or Wendy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Hard & Set rules vs. Comfort & Convience interpretation, Smokerbros |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Hard & Set rules vs. Comfort & Convience interpretation, Rocky Entriken |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |