--On Friday, February 27, 2004 11:08 AM -0600 James Rogerson
<jrogerson@houston.rr.com> wrote:
> Pick another reason for requiring the book. How about try to prove what
> year my RX-7 is. There is no requirement in FP for proof of year. So
> which manual should I pick?
What the proposal is trying to say is the manual for the car as entered
(as listed on the entry form) must be provided. So if the competitor
lists the car as a 1986 Mustang, he must have the documentation for a
1986 Mustang. If he's updated to a 1988 shell, he must also have the
documentation to demonstrate that this is legal.
If the proposal doesn't clearly say that, then the SEB needs that feedback.
Or if you think it should say something else, the SEB needs to hear that.
I'm willing to believe that the manual is truly unneeded in Prepared, if
you can convince me (and the rest of the SEB). The thought was that the
manual is needed to interpret how some of the Section 17 allowances apply
to your car. But if that's really not true for Prepared, let us know.
Mark
|