autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Compliance Checks

To: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>,
Subject: Re: Compliance Checks
From: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:44:37 -0500
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
To: "Larry Steckel" <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com>
Cc: <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: Compliance Checks


> On Tuesday, Sep 24, 2002, at 06:01 US/Pacific, Larry Steckel wrote:
>
> > We tell the competitor that according to the rule book, that bit isn't
> > legal. If they are a first timer, we usually give them a pass and tell
> > them
> > to correct it before the next event. For people who should know
> > better, the
> > head tech inspector informs them that they are now running in Street
> > Prepared or Mod or whatever.  This has prevented a lot of protests
> > over the
> > years and let all the competitors know that we are enforcing fair
> > competition.
>
> Do you have local supps that provide the authority for that, or how
> does it work?  There's nothing in the rule book to provide for
> mandating classifications like that, is why I ask.
>
> KeS
>

Of course on a local basis, "that's how we do it here" is about all that is
necessary. The rulebook is not mandatory, except for the specific provisions
enumerated in 1.1.

--Rocky

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>