Re: Acceptable finish designs.

To:	bklingler@worldnet.att.net, autox@autox.team.net
Subject:	Re: Acceptable finish designs.
From:	Smokerbros@aol.com
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:45:58 EST

Bob-

2 different course designers, I think.  This one was actually okay after 
moving the line back.  It would've been a mess where it was...

Charlie

///          autox@autox.team.net mailing list
///
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe autox
///
///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Acceptable finish designs., (continued) Re: Acceptable finish designs., Rocky Entriken Re: Acceptable finish designs., Rocky Entriken Re: Acceptable finish designs., Hottvr RE: Acceptable finish designs., Paul Zahornasky Re: Acceptable finish designs., matthew c. mead Re: Acceptable finish designs., Scott Peterson Re: Acceptable finish designs., TeamZ06 Re: Acceptable finish designs., Scot Zediker Re: Acceptable finish designs., TeamZ06 Re: Acceptable finish designs., Rocky Entriken Re: Acceptable finish designs., Smokerbros <=

Previous by Date:	Re: No Lubbock Pro Solo?, C. Williams
Next by Date:	Re: Failed NOx emissions. HELP!!!!, Chris Fletcher
Previous by Thread:	Re: Acceptable finish designs., Rocky Entriken
Next by Thread:	Re: Acceptable finish designs, Hottvr
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]