I can't resist.
First, Paul wrote these kind words in the midst of an orderly, courteous
discussion:
>>If you want to change the rule then go right ahead and change it. But until
>you do, you and the SCCA "bosses" are a bunch of hypocrites<<
Then Mark sez:
>>That's not what the rules say, but it's no surprise that you read into things
>only what you want to see. You got the creep part right, anyways.<<
To which Paul responds:
>>Why don't you simply discuss the issues instead of getting into personal
>insults?<<
To which I'm responding (for Mark, but hey, I'm the hypocrite here)... Tit for
Tat dude. U started the name calling. Sort of hiding it in a subject related
paragraph doesn't change the fact. Why does netiquette go to hell in a hand
basket when U get involved?
-brad
(No more personal business, I promise.)
|