To: | "Larry Steckel" <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com>, eric10mm@qni.com, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Coolant? |
From: | bfuhrman@isd.net |
Date: | Thu, 11 Jan 2001 18:59:20 GMT |
>Eric, >Normal antifreezes are designed to give the best benefit (freeze protection >and boil protection ) when mixed in a 50%/50% ratio. If you look at the >chart on any full strength antifreeze bottle it will show a -34F freeze >protection and the best boil over protection at that mixture. So pouring one >bottle of full strength antifreeze and one bottle of water will achieve the >desired mix. I will take some exception to that description of WHY a 50/50 mix is recommended. The best "boil over protection" would be pure antifreeze. The best "freeze protection" is at a higher mix but it is a mixture of both materials. The best "heat transfer" is with no antifreeze. The best "cost" is with no antifreeze. The best "corosion protection" is probably pure antifreeze. The 50/50 mix is a general combination that provides a good trade off among all the "bests" and works in most climates for most people. If someone knows what they are doing, it is very likely that they may find a "better" mix for their purpose. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Coolant? (long response, contains technical neepery), Jay Mitchell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Coolant? (long response, contains technical neepery), Jonathan Kniskern |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Coolant?, Larry Steckel |
Next by Thread: | Re: Coolant?, Jim Hedderick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |