To: | elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org, autox@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Coolant? |
From: | "Larry Steckel" <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2001 21:28:47 -0500 |
The "environmentally safe" antifreeze uses propylene glycol instead of ethylene glycol. The EPA rates the propylene stuff as "non toxic." Antifreeze of this type uses a specific add pack that will mix with the PG. However, it isn't as efficient as the EG varieties. Larry. >From: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org> >Reply-To: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org> >To: "'autox'" <autox@autox.team.net> >Subject: RE: Coolant? >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:50:12 -0600 > >So, is it safe/wise to run only water with or without the Redline Water >Wetter type stuff (which I heard was nothing more than soapy water) in the >summer months? What are the advantages and/or disadvantages versus the >traditional water/glycol mixtures? What about this new non-glycol based >coolant ont he market, the environmentally "safe" stuff? > >If your sanctioning body/race facility would allow it what would _you_ run >instead of plain water for a coolant? > >Eric Linnhoff in KC >1998 Dodge Neon R/T >#69 STS #13 TLS >eric10mm@qni.com >ICQ#101282513 > > >-----Original Message----- >Nothing we can use will transfer more heat than water.A little " water >wetter " >will help. >Sid _________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Coolant?, Larry Steckel |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Coolant?, Larry Steckel |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Coolant?, Larry Steckel |
Next by Thread: | Re: Coolant?, Larry Steckel |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |