| To: | autox@autox.team.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: rev limiter |
| From: | dg50@daimlerchrysler.com |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:17:03 -0500 |
TeamZ3@aol.com entered into evidence as exhibit 1 > Further, I think a protester could easily make a sound argument to the PC for > a DSQ against another competitor on the basis that a rev limit indicator > (light, buzzer, H&C nad/bush kicker, etc) is a non-allowable > performance-enhancing device I submit, my Lord, that any device that has as an essential componant a mechanism designed to strike the operator in the genetailia is a performance LIMITING device, not an enhancement. DG |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: rev limiter?, Roger Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Demographics Now, dg50 |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: rev limiter, Michael McAvoy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Contributing to the SM Inclusion Lis, Murray, Matthew D. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |