The point is obvious to me. What is the part you don't get?
mrndr2@juno.com has explained the rule and its common misinterpretation.
Near as I can tell, the explanation is bang on. I consider this a public
service, as I, too, have seen this rule misused many times on this list.
Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA
1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Chev Suburban
LOON, MAC pethier@isd.net http://www.mnautox.com/
"If I can do it, it's not art" - Red Green
-----Original Message-----
From: Hottvr@aol.com <Hottvr@aol.com>
To: mrndr2@juno.com <mrndr2@juno.com>; autox@autox.team.net
<autox@autox.team.net>
Date: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: 1000 car rule
>In a message dated 7/5/00 6:22:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time, mrndr2@juno.com
>writes:
>
><< > And since the 1000
> > car rule doesn't seem to exist
>
> See page 85 of the 2000 rule book.
>
> The 1000 car rule reads, "Cars not specifically listed in Stock Category
> classes must have been produced in quantities of at least 1,000 in a
> 12-month period to be entered in the Stock Category."
>
> Despite the common misperception, it does not read, "Cars must have been
> produced in quantities of at least 1,000 in a 12-month period to be
> entered in the Stock Category."
>
> In other words, if you want to slide a Jaguhonota Vr57 into some stock
> class under a generic "Jaguhonota NOC" or a "Jaguhonota X-body" or a
> "Jaguhonota X-cylinder" or an "all RWD pick-up trucks NOC" listing, you
> better be darn sure that Jaguhonota made at least 1,000 Vr57s in a 12
> month period.
>
> In contrast, if the SEB chooses to class a Jaguhonota Vr57 in X Stock, it
> doesn't matter if there were 3 or 300,000 of them made--the SEB is
> convinced it's a X Stock car, and that's where it goes. At least until
> member input or performance results convince them otherwise. ( :
>
> mlc
> '91 MR2 NA >>
>
>Ok whats the point here????? I don't get it???
>
>Mike B. 99cm
>
|