autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Car Classing Theory and Practice

To: "'Murray, Matthew D.'" <MDMURRAY@gwns.com>
Subject: RE: Car Classing Theory and Practice
From: Jeff Winchell <jwinchell@Giftspot.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 14:19:20 -0700
Well, it's diverse all right. But what is the theory/reason on why these
cars were chosen to be in there?

-----Original Message-----
From: Murray, Matthew D. [mailto:MDMURRAY@gwns.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 2:03 PM
To: Me
Cc: autox@autox.team.net; Murray, Matthew D.
Subject: Car Classing Theory and Practice


Lemmy think. . . . A Stock? Porsches (968, 944S2, Boxster, pre-'95 911),
BMWs 
(M3, Z3 [open & coupe]), MR2, TVR, 300ZX, S2000. Drivers? Kozlaks, GH Sharp,

Faulkner, Sipe, Beutow (sp?), Thompson, Geoke, Bauer, and some other crappy 
Northeast drivers. :^)

Matt Murray
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Can you give some examples of a well formed, yet
diverse class and why the different car features of it's members make sense?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>