Must.... Resist... I can't...
So, the "Depends" car could conger up some real interesting graphics ;-). I
can't wait to see the first dipper car ;-).
---JCG
----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Volpp <volpp@netdoor.com>
To: <Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com>; team.net <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: Pro Solo graphics feedback
> A) Number location and size could be mandated, but size and color would be
> up to the car owner. (like NASCAR)
>
> B) Mandatory stickers should be placed in one area (like NASCAR) BUT,
> participants should know clearly what they are getting or able to get for
> providing the advertising space. What did the Racing Electronics stickers
> do for anyone? Why do we have to run a SCCA sticker? We know where we
are.
> They want to make us look pro, but pro organizations like CART and
NASCAR,
> do not have cars that say "CART" on the side.
>
> I think the idea was valid, but maybe not executed so well. We need to
> remember that right or wrong, it was an attempt by the SCCA to make things
> better. What would cure all this would be Pro money in Pro. If the SCCA
> cannot do it, as members we need to work together to get a Fortune 500
> company to sponsor this thing. I'll drive the "Depends" car if it means we
> have a better sport.
> ----------
> >From: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
> >To: autox@autox.team.net
> >Subject: Pro Solo graphics feedback
> >Date: Thu, Oct 28, 1999, 8:02 PM
> >
>
> >
> >
> >I want to know how everyone felt about the Pro Solo Graphics packages in
1999.
> >I know some had a fundamental problem with haveing 'mandatory' stickers
packages
> >but I am really looking for more feedback on the design, placement, color
> >choices etc.
> >
> >Do you feel like it added to Pro Solo or took away? How would you change
it?
> >
> >AB
> >
> >
>
|