Justin Hughes wrote:
>
> > My point was that it would make an ES neon (potentially) as fast as a DS
> > neon... thereby blowing the other ES cars outta the water. Much as I like
> > neons and spec classes, I think having _two_ neon dominated classes might
> > be a bit much.
>
> Guess I kinda missed your point the first time, but I get it now. :) From
> my perspective, this change would make it possible for other cars to keep
> right up with the Neons, preventing complete Neon domination in either
> class. At least that's how I see it. You see it differently. I have no
> idea which of us would end up being right.
Me either - but, I can think of no specific example of where allowing
folks to add a front or rear bar of their choice to the existing stock
cars would upset *any* applecart. It MAY allow some otherwise
uncompetitive cars to be a little more competitive. Maybe.
Can anyone name one example of where the allowance would kill a now
dominant car?
The front swaybar allowance was fine for its time. The current
suggestion, considering all of the automotive evolution that has
happened since, (to me) makes a lot of sense.
How can we request that this be given formal consideration? Write
letters? All this talk on Team.net will actually lead nowhere, and as
Byron mentioned, last time this came up *very few* actually responded to
a query.
Scott Meyers
|