Amen, Lloyd. I like what you've written.
Lloyd.Wilson@Alcan.Com wrote:
>
> My point, besides adding some humor is, if you do not like the rules you can
> petition for changes but do it for the correct reasons not just to satisfy a
> few peoples selfish needs. If the rules do not fit your car, then maybe you
> need to get another car. Every car made in the world will not be competitive
> unless everyone has their own class.
I agree. I'm not being selfish (or a whining loser, as M. Sipe seems to think
we're
all being). I'm happy with my car the way it is, and nobody's beating me because
they have changed their front bar and I can't/don't want to. I just think that a
stock class should be stock unless there is a compelling reason do be otherwise.
I'm not a national competitor, but if I decide to try in the future, (and stock
is
probably what I'd try), I don't want to have to spend any more money and time on
the setup than I have to. I just want rules that make sense, and allowing this
alteration to stock cars doesn't make sense.
>
>
> Many people haven given the "sway bar" people options to go to ST. My
>personal
> feeling is your messing with a class I like the way it is, Stock Class. Go
> somewhere else and change your sway bars, but leave stock class alone.
>
> Lloyd Wilson
> 100K Racing
> 93 Prelude VTEC - FWD and I need no stinking sway bar change, Honda did it
> right the first time.
That being the case, (and don't let me put words in your mouth), it sounds like
you
would be in favor of a stock class rule that simply says your sway bars must be
stock.
--
John Crooke
Crooke_John@bah.com
|