autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The 'New' G Stock?vs DS times ...

To: "Jim & Marilyn Rohn" <rohns@doitnow.com>, <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: The 'New' G Stock?vs DS times ...
From: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 15:33:42 -0700
As stated before, you can't draw car or class comparison data from one
event, especially when the classes don't run close to the same time of day.
ie GS ran first group, first day, with dampness.  HS ran 4th on a mid day
hot, dry, cleaned off course.  No surprise HS beat us :-).
---JCG
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim & Marilyn Rohn <rohns@doitnow.com>
To: <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 1999 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: The 'New' G Stock?vs DS times ...


> At 10:20 AM 9/3/99, Joe Goeke wrote:
> >Oh please!!!!!  Just look at the data before making generalization
> >statements like "perceived" top car.  Look at the GS times compared to
the
> >other classes this year, and then the last couple of years.  The GS
winning
> >times are WAY up.  GS use to run about 0.5 behind DS on the average.  It
now
> >kills DS.  Same great drivers in DS.
>
> uhhh, lets look at how "well" GS does against HS, or rather try to figure
> out why HS has whipped GS butt at the last 2 Nationals ...
>
> just another twist
>
> Jim Rohn
> Beater Racing
>
> Hey, it's less than 2 weeks away from Nationals, isn't it high time some
> awesome car gets "mis-classed"??
>
> or should they just take the Type R *out* of GS with the same lead time
> they put it in???
>
> (in case you can't see it, the above "R" comment is to be applied with
> heaping doses of humor and sarcasm)
>
>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>