autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: GEEZ course map & accuracy

To: "'Mark Sirota'" <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>, Byron Short <bshort@AFSinc.com>
Subject: RE: GEEZ course map & accuracy
From: John Steczkowski <stecz@Crossroads.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 09:21:24 -0500
The car magazines use an "optical 5th wheel" like you describe to get their
performance stats. You can usually see it suction cupped to the side of a
car in the photos of the car during the testing.

----
John Steczkowski
Director, Server I/O
Crossroads Systems, Inc.
512-794-2742



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Sirota [mailto:msirota@isc.upenn.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 1999 9:46 AM
> To: Byron Short
> Cc: Craig Blome; autox@autox.team.net; marka@telerama.com
> Subject: Re: GEEZ course map & accuracy
> 
> 
> Byron Short wrote:
> > I know of a system built by real serious folks that used three
> > accelerometers and three yaw rate sensors which was accurate to this
> > level.  (About 1 meter after 5 miles of travel I'm told.)  That's
> > really cool stuff!  But it's not gonna happen from a two pole
> > accelerometer. It's not even gonna happen with three poles, and a
> > single yaw rate sensor.  It'll take the whole enchilada.
> 
> One really clever way of doing this that I've seen is to have a very
> high res, high speed camera pointed straight down at the ground.  By
> analyzing the movement of the ground relative to the car, one can
> determine the exact path travelled.  Hardware's not tough, but the
> software would be.
> 
> I forget where I first saw this technique.  In some car or racing
> magazine, I'm sure...
> 
> Mark
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>