Ok a couple of us have kidded Ken, andnow Brian needs the same treatment.
Seriously how about some discussion from those with out vested interests in
either Brands.
For those out of the know Ken has a long time committment with BFG and since
Kumho is a sponsor of the McKamey Schools Brian obviously has some influence
from that direction. Not that either would let this sway thier opinons :).
This leave out Scotty as well.
Rob
Brian Priebe wrote:
> I tend to disagree with Ken on a few areas.
>
> "They are heavy and you have to break a week and a half earlier than
> the BFG's."
>
> That is a complete opposite from what I have found. I can brake much
> much later on the Kumhos than the BFG's. And the Kumhos don't Flat Spot
> like the G-Forces, I just had to rotate Renee's tires on the rims due to
> lock up flat spots.
>
> "They are squishy and the response in quick transitions is slower than
> molasses than the BFG's."
>
> I don't think there is that much of a difference in transitions. You
> can be more aggressive with the kumhos which may be due to slightly
> slower turn in.
>
> "They are not fast out of the box as the BFG's"
>
> I think this is just wrong.
>
> "They do last wear longer than the BFG's"
>
> I definitely agree.
>
> "They do seem to be very forgiving than the BFG's"
>
> ditto
>
> "They are cheaper on cost than the BFG's"
>
> Yup, Yup
>
> "Overall, they are, well I guess it doesn't matter, at least they are
> round."
>
> --Brian Priebe
|