To: | dg50@daimlerchrysler.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Why DOT? Why not slicks? |
From: | washburn <washburn@dwave.net> |
Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 1999 21:22:20 -0500 |
dg50@daimlerchrysler.com wrote: > > With all the tire talk lately, this question has surfaced in my mind: > > Why do we require DOT race tires? Why not allow race slicks too? > Perhaps it's because it's in keeping with the spirit of a "stock" car. Meaning that it should be street drivable. Meaning they should have DOT approval. Meaning........well.....that's all I mean. :) end-o-meaningfull message -- Patrick Washburn <washburn@dwave.net> Wausau, WI Land of Cheese 95 DS Neon Moooooooooo. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Safety Tech Procedure, Jamie Sculerati |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Fw: SOLO 1 - Closed vs Open Cars, Jamie Sculerati |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Why DOT? Why not slicks?, Jason Bowles |
Next by Thread: | RE: Car numbers was - May 1999 Cover, Bill Fuhrmann |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |