| To: | dg50@daimlerchrysler.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why DOT? Why not slicks? | 
| From: | washburn <washburn@dwave.net> | 
| Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 1999 21:22:20 -0500 | 
dg50@daimlerchrysler.com wrote: > > With all the tire talk lately, this question has surfaced in my mind: > > Why do we require DOT race tires? Why not allow race slicks too? > Perhaps it's because it's in keeping with the spirit of a "stock" car. Meaning that it should be street drivable. Meaning they should have DOT approval. Meaning........well.....that's all I mean. :) end-o-meaningfull message -- Patrick Washburn <washburn@dwave.net> Wausau, WI Land of Cheese 95 DS Neon Moooooooooo.  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Safety Tech Procedure, Jamie Sculerati | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Fw: SOLO 1 - Closed vs Open Cars, Jamie Sculerati | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why DOT? Why not slicks?, Jason Bowles | 
| Next by Thread: | RE: Car numbers was - May 1999 Cover, Bill Fuhrmann | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |