autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ST Classification..any solid rules?

To: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Subject: Re: ST Classification..any solid rules?
From: Gary McDaniel <mcnjohn@sierratel.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 08:30:25 -0800
-NEVER-??? Don't tell that to the "ricers". I'm having a good time in
this ST class beating them with my domestic Z24. I look forward to
having more of them show up. ;-)
Gary McDaniel
97 Cavalier Z24 #49ST


> 
> Im just of the opinion, that ST is built for the ricers, cars that were
> -never- meant to be a performance car in the first place.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: whitney [SMTP:whitneys@mindspring.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 1999 11:51 AM
> > To:   Mohler, Jeff; autox@autox.team.net
> > Subject:      Re: ST Classification..any solid rules?
> >
> > I believe the GSX/talon AWD fits, because the 2WD version is ST legal, and
> > the unlimited drivetrain allowance would cover the AWD system.  Check with
> > Howard Duncan to be sure, but I have brought it up to them before, and
> > remeber it being OK.
> >
> > Stan Whitney
> >
> > DP/EP CRX  (still for sale - now a Natl. tour winner)
> > GS Talon AWD

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>