That's my point exactly...I dont see purpose built "sports cars" to fit
under ST*
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiram Cuebas [SMTP:HCUEBAS@techforce.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 1999 9:57 AM
> To: 'Mohler, Jeff'; autox@autox.team.net
> Subject: RE: ST Classification..any solid rules?
>
> If I`m not mistaken the cars allowed for this class would be NORMALLY
> ASPIRATED four passanger vehicle with a engine size of 3.1 or less.
> Having four doors doesn`t matter providing that the car is made in four
> door configuration. Example; Neon, VW Jetta, Civic qualify and Preludes
> and Sciroccos would be excluded.
> So I don`t think that your friend GSX would quilify for any ST class.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mohler, Jeff [SMTP:jeff.mohler@wilcom.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 1999 10:39 AM
> > To: autox@autox.team.net
> > Subject: ST Classification..any solid rules?
> >
> > What do you all think ST will turn into?
> >
> > Im debating that the STU class will only allow the "types" of cars
> > allowed
> > in ST.
> >
> > But..what defines the "type" of car allowed in ST??
> >
> > A friend in a GSX would love to go whole-hog on modifications, but I
> > dont
> > belive the GSX (Eclipse or not) fits the "type" of car allowed in ST.
> >
> > Thoughts?
|