>From what I understand, a 95 Cobra R is way better than the other
Cobras, yet it is on the same line. So why not the 99 Cobra too?
From: Tom Gentry <tgentry@execpc.com>
To: autox list <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: New car classifications
Date sent: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 14:42:31 -0600
Send reply to: Tom Gentry <tgentry@execpc.com>
> >>the 99+ Cobra Mustang in FS and ESP on a separate line. No IRS
> >>update/backdate. <<
>
> While I understand what being on a seperate line means to me, no
> update/backdate, I really don't understand the rationale. My car's
> chassis is virtually identical to a 99, they're both in FS and ESP, the
> IRS is supposed to be a bolt on, etc. It seems instead of keeping costs
> down SCCA is trying to force more new car purchases.
>
> Mustangs aside, it just seems that updates/backdates should be allowed
> within a class, especially when they are bolt ons.
>
> If the IRS proves to be worthless that means the 99 Cobra's won't have the
> ability to put in the live axle either.
>
> Tom Gentry
> Life is too short to drive boring cars!
> '96 Ford SVT Cobra, Mystic #1345/2000 (mostly stock)
> '72 Triumph TR-6 OD (mostly modified)
> '59 Triumph Model 10 Sedan (mostly in boxes)
>
>
>
|