This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--part0_918837832_boundary
Content-ID: <0_918837832@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1>
--part0_918837832_boundary
Content-ID: <0_918837832@inet_out.mail.aol.com.2>
Content-disposition: inline
From: Streldoc@aol.com
Return-path: <Streldoc@aol.com>
To: macross@gte.net
Subject: Re: Fuel Cut off and Turbos
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 00:30:32 EST
Mime-Version: 1.0
In a message dated 2/11/99 8:00:41 PM Central Standard Time, macross@gte.net
writes:
<< I would say that
removing a fuel cut based on air flow would be legal under the first
sentence of 14.10.C "Carburetors, fuel injection, intercoolers and intake
manifolds are unrestricted." >>
But then it plainly says that "No changes are allowed to waste gates, pressure
sensors and their locations, and to other turbocharger or supercharger boost
limiting systems." I would say that the computer program is a "system" that
uses MAF imput to decide when to cut off boost. I believe Jamie was able to
get around this rule by saying that his "trick" computer changes only his fuel
injection parameters (which I would say is MAF vs. fuel curves) which is
obviously open. That is fine as long as the variable that cuts off boost
based on a certain MAF is left in that program. How do you prove that???
Erik Strelnieks
--part0_918837832_boundary--
|