"William H. Engle, Sr." wrote:
> Why is it that changes with a purpose are always opposed by people who
> do not understand, have no knowledge of, or are not affected by the
> change or the reason for its purpose.
I hope you don't mean that as an insult.
> Of all the classes with racing transmissions CM would seem to be the
> only class that would be unaffected.
So why include CM in the proposal?
> Removing a 3 oz idler eliminates this risk. Anyone that thinks 3 oz
> is of performance significance in Solo is..........
Anyone who thinks that all that will result is a 3 oz weight reduction
is sticking their head in the sand. Strong competitors look for
loopholes. Wise rule-writers don't offer them any.
> Why oppose a rule change that is of benefit to people in another
> class, when it docent even effect your class?
Because it *could* affect our class. I don't mind making this allowance
for other classes. I just don't want this allowance to affect CM.
What's so wrong with that?
Mark
///
/// autox-cm@autox.team.net mailing list
///
|