alpines
[Top] [All Lists]

Aztec

To: Christopher Albers <Christopher.Albers@bubbs.biola.edu>
Subject: Aztec
From: jeyerman@ix.netcom.com
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:04:09 -0400
While the Aztec seems like some sort of bad joke, consider that many, many 
trend setting cars were also failures when new and often were the ugliest 
things on the road at the time- the Chrysler Airflow of 1934 comes to mind as 
does the 1947 Studebaker-but both were the first of the "new" cars.  

Sadly, it has been pointed out that Daimler Benz is NOT the comapny of new 
ideas and fast marketing so the PT Cruiser, Prowler and Viper are probably 
things of the past and we will get Euro-boxes from Chrysler in the future.

Jan


Christopher Albers <Christopher.Albers@bubbs.biola.edu> wrote:
> tom.hill@att.net writes:
>I read an article (http://www.msnbc.com/news/475146.asp?0nm=T25C) about
>inventory backlog for GM.  They have a 184 day supply of Azteks while
>Chrysler has a mere 23 day supply of PT Cruisers.  Why is it when GM
>produces a "dream car" it's more like a nightmare.  Ford and especially
>Chrysler seem to be spot on with their "boutique" cars (new Thunderbird,
>Prowler, PT Cruiser, Viper, etc).

I gotta throw in on this one.  Without a doubt, the Aztek is the
epitome of garish ugliness and by far the most hideous vehicle ever put
into production.  I can imagine the words Aztek and Edsel being uttered
in the same breath all over the world at this very moment.

CNA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>