alpines
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: aztec

To: J Arzt <humber_snipe@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: aztec
From: Victor Hughes <v.hughes@student.canberra.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:57:28 +1000
After all this Aztec talk I just had to see what they looked like (Not sold in
Australia, which, after viewing one on the Pontiac website, is a defimite
advantage for Australians) Still, you guys never had to suffer the hideous
Leyland P76. Please don't send us any Aztecs.

Vic Hughes

J Arzt wrote:

> With one major exception - the Edsel was later recognized as a classic,
> something that will NEVER happen to something as unbelievably ugly as the
> Aztek. Whoever is responsible for the design should be sacrificed to the
> Aztec gods.
>
> Jon Arzt
>
> >From: Christopher.Albers@bubbs.biola.edu (Christopher Albers)
> >Reply-To: Christopher.Albers@bubbs.biola.edu (Christopher Albers)
> >To: tom.hill@att.net
> >CC: tjhiggin@chris.iss.ingr.com, alpines@autox.team.net
> >Subject: Re: color
> >Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:31:15 -0700
> >
> >tom.hill@att.net writes:
> > >I read an article (http://www.msnbc.com/news/475146.asp?0nm=T25C) about
> > >inventory backlog for GM.  They have a 184 day supply of Azteks while
> > >Chrysler has a mere 23 day supply of PT Cruisers.  Why is it when GM
> > >produces a "dream car" it's more like a nightmare.  Ford and especially
> > >Chrysler seem to be spot on with their "boutique" cars (new Thunderbird,
> > >Prowler, PT Cruiser, Viper, etc).
> >
> >I gotta throw in on this one.  Without a doubt, the Aztek is the
> >epitome of garish ugliness and by far the most hideous vehicle ever put
> >into production.  I can imagine the words Aztek and Edsel being uttered
> >in the same breath all over the world at this very moment.
> >
> >CNA
>
> _________________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>