6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [6pack] 3 carbs

To: 6 pack <6pack@autox.team.net>, Dale <tpdwinch@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [6pack] 3 carbs
From: Jim Jones <jimjcmo@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
Well, I say, "What's the point?" For most of us these cars are toys that are 
driven occasionally as opposed to daily drivers. In my youth I drove my first 
TR6 600 miles in a day in 95 degree head. At age 52 I'd never even contemplate 
such a feat. (Yes, I'm whimpy old white guy!) For me, my car is for enjoyment 
and tinkering to see how much more zip I can get out of it. Fuel economy is not 
part of that equation.
&nbsp;
No disrespect meant. Just responding to your query, bro'!
&nbsp;
Jim

--- On Sat, 6/14/08, Dale &lt;tpdwinch@yahoo.com&gt; wrote:

From: Dale &lt;tpdwinch@yahoo.com&gt;
Subject: [6pack] 3 carbs
To: "6 pack" &lt;6pack@autox.team.net&gt;
Date: Saturday, June 14, 2008, 4:46 PM

List
 
A few of at our bi-weekly breakfast today were talking of gas economy
for the stock TR6.
 
Is there any advantage, from an economy stand point, to
use the 1.5  carbs from the GT 6 on  a 3 carb manifold? 
 
Having the runners
straighter and putting less and more precise amounts of fuel into each
cylinder should help economy on a stock engine.
 
What say you all?
 
Dale  
6pack@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/6pack

http://www.team.net/archive

You are subscribed as jimjcmo@yahoo.com
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

6pack@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/6pack

http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>