6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Paint Codes Royal Blue 56 PPG 13126

To: tr6@kc4sw.com
Subject: Re: Paint Codes Royal Blue 56 PPG 13126
From: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:45:09 -0400
Hi Steve,

Well... I've got the two-stage paint already, so I guess there's no 
turning back, unless the color is wrong, and I've gotten some other 
emails which make me think it is correct. I guess I'll have him shoot a 
fender or door (they are off the car) it and compare it with what is in 
the engine compartment. Really wstarting to wish we had done a computer 
match.

Sometimes "ya pays your money and takes your chances" I guess.

Thanks for the tips,

Don



Stephen Hanselman wrote:
> Don,
> 
> I had the PPG-OMNI single stage put on my TR.  It came out looking real
> good.  As the paint folks indicated two stage paints are new and the
> original paint was a single stage.  In my case, the car was garaged (or at
> least shedded) for 10 years the factory paint held up real well.
> 
> I'm not entirely sure that the added cost of two-stage paint is really worth
> it, unless you're going to show it.
> 
> Steve
> tr6@kc4sw.com
> www.kc4sw.com.triumph.htm
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-6pack@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-6pack@autox.team.net]On
> Behalf Of Don Malling
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:47 PM
> To: 6-Pack; triumphs@autox.team.net
> Subject: Paint Codes Royal Blue 56 PPG 13126
> 
> 
> The body shop bought the paint for my TR250 Royal Blue 56. I expected to
> get PPG 13126 which is the number everyone lists but the paint store
> gave the body shop a Chrysler color DBC3146 OEM 1 832-1.
> 
> I talked to the paint store and they said the original PPG color was
> 13126, but it's not possible for them to formulate the older colors with
> the new two stage Urethane paints and that PPG provides a best possible
> "blendable" equivalent color, which for Triumph 56 (old PPG 13126) is
> DBC 3146.
> 
> The paint store was able to cross reference Martin Senior and Dupont
> color codes to PPG 13126, so I assume their data was good.
> 
> I see from the web that this is a typical situation. Has anyone been
> through this before and is DBC 3146 the correct PPG equivalent to 13126?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Don Malling

///  6pack@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>