6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Problems at 4500 RPM

To: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Problems at 4500 RPM
From: "Gary Fluke" <res0s0t7@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:04:01 -0700
Jim, Jim, Jim...

Do we need to take up a collection and send you back to charm school?


Gary
'73

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>
To: "'Sally or Dick Taylor'" <tr6taylor@webtv.net>; <6pack@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 10:53 PM
Subject: RE: Problems at 4500 RPM


> Oh for Christ's sake!
> 
> More vague crap!
> 
> Has the supercharger been installed?
> 
> Jim Swarthout
> 
> 
> Jim---You may have thought it humorous, but it was on my reply, not the
> original post. Neither was called for.          
> Seth's post read that "his engine would not rev past 4500 rpms", not
> simply go flat. We know that the power band drops off considerably with
> a stock valve train around this rpm, but should still be able to get to
> the red line.
> My reply to Seth was centered around areas that could have been the
> cause of this rev restriction. An earlier post by Seth made known the
> fact that he was trying out a supercharger, a different carburetor,
> ignition, and some other "new" things. 
> Those of us following this thread knew of this. 
> 
> Jim wrote on, in part:
> ..Seth's description, (of the circumstances surrounding his
> disappointment in the engines ability to rev), was vague at best. 
> For example: 
> ...Maybe the engine had a "non-stock" cam prior to being rebuilt? These
> engines are very sensitive to valve train modifications. In other words,
> it takes very little to really make the engine come alive as is evident
> by the fact that high ratio rockers make such a difference....
> 
> Nice plug!
> 
> ....To everyone who may be new to Triumphs and automotive mechanics in
> general: 
> When using a communication medium that is fraught with delays, (e-mail),
> it is important to be concise when providing a synopsis of events that
> led to a problem. It is far more courteous when asking others for their
> time; to spend a little time ensuring that you have provided every bit
> of information pertaining to your problem. 
> Again, 
> No offense intended, 
> Jim Swarthout 
> 
> I can't disagree with that!
> 
> Dick Taylor

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>