6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Intake Port Spacing Question

To: <dstauffa@csc.com>, "Bernard Robbins" <brobbins@wlg.nec.co.nz>
Subject: RE: Intake Port Spacing Question
From: "Don Clark" <d@donclark.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:47:33 -0700
So in the US did the intake ports start close together and then get wider
apart? Or did they start wider and then get narrower?

The reason that I want to know is this: The head on my car has intake ports
that are farther apart than the manifold that I was shipped with my webers.
I ordered the weber kit for a 1972 TR6 and was shipped a manifold with
narrow intake port spacing and want to know if I was shipped the correct
part or not.

I just got off the phone with a shop in Seattle (Autosport) and they said
that they are 90% certain that the later ones are the wider of the two. I
would like to be 100% sure before I ask the place that I bought my weber kit
from pay for shipping me the correct part. That is if they will answer the
phone or return my call.

Thanks again,
Don Clark
Seattle, WA




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-6pack@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-6pack@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of dstauffa@csc.com
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 3:07 PM
To: Bernard Robbins
Cc: Don Clark; 6pack@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Intake Port Spacing Question


Hi Bernard & Don,

Bernard - the reason that you might have not noticed a difference is that
there was not any for the PI engines!  All PI heads have the same port
spacing.  For some reason  unknown to me, Leyland made a different head for
all North American TR6s for 1969 - 1972.  After that, Leyland dropped that
head design and used the standard PI head and all TR6s.

Hope this clears it up a bit.

Dave Stauffacher
Ramona, Ca
1970 PI TR6






Bernard Robbins <brobbins@wlg.nec.co.nz>@autox.team.net on 10/13/2000
03:37:18 AM

Please respond to Bernard Robbins <brobbins@wlg.nec.co.nz>

Sent by:  owner-6pack@autox.team.net


To:   "Don Clark" <d@donclark.org>, <6pack@autox.team.net>
cc:
Subject:  Re: Intake Port Spacing Question


Hi Don,

Hmmm, narrower intake spacings... I'm not aware there are any differences
on the 2500 engines (not that I'm an expert mind). However, I thought there
may have been a difference between some of the 2000 heads and 2500. Perhaps
in the past your car received a cyl head of a GT6?

Please keep up posted on the results...

Cheers
Bernard

71 2500 PI (in disgrace)
73 TR6 PI (going great with matched intakes...)






At 14:30 12/10/00 -0700, Don Clark wrote:
>Thanks for the responses to my earlier question about using the choke on
the
>DCOE's. It appears that it's not going to matter for a while because I was
>shipped the wrong intake manifold for the head that's on my car. Anyway, I
>now have the following question:
>
>What years of TR6 had the narrow spacing on the intake ports? I searched
the
>archives and in my catalogs and can't seem to find an answer other than
one
>is narrower than the other.
>
>Thanks,
>Don Clark
>Seattle, WA
>
>72 Pimento with mismatched intake manifold.
>
>
>
>
Regards


Bernard Robbins

NEC New Zealand Ltd
Network Solutions
P.O. Box 1936
Wellington

Ph   (04) 381 6274
fax  (04) 381 6284
email     brobbins@wlg.nec.co.nz






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>