Subject: Re: [Tigers] 1967 Tigers

From: Stu via Tigers <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:09:38 -0400

--===============3831245923401343212==

--001a1140501e220a4c0537ab7ec2

I have '2452, with a Jensen date in the late summer of '66 like Tod's.  But
it was first registered in feb of '67 in upstate NY as a '67.

Stu
On Jul 15, 2016 12:01 AM, "Tod Brown via Tigers" <[email-masked]>
wrote:

> Whether a Tiger was designated a 1967 or 1966 model was a decision
> usually left up to
> the DMV in the state where the car was sold. My Tiger, for example, which
> I bought on
> October 15, 1966 in NY state, was registered as a 67. Its serial no. is
> B382002384LRXFE.
> Its birthday, IIRC, was actually August 29, 1966 according to the info from
> Norm.
> I have seen other Tigers with later serial numbers which are registered
> as 66's, so there
> is little rhyme nor reason.
>
> As others have noted, MkIA manufacture ended in late 1966. Interestingly,
> from what
> I have seen, MkII cars were being produced before MkIA production ceased,
> so there
> was some overlap. To my knowledge (and I am not infallible, as my wife
> often points out)
> all of the MkII's that came to the states were registered as 67's, even
> though a few of
> them may have been produced in 1966.
>
> Tod Brown
> B382002384LRXFE
> TAC 864
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> [email-masked]
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/[email-masked]
>
>
>
>

--001a1140501e220a4c0537ab7ec2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">I have &#39;2452, with a Jensen date in the late summer of &=
#39;66 like Tod&#39;s.=C2=A0 But it was first registered in feb of &#39;67 =
in upstate NY as a &#39;67.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Stu</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jul 15, 2016 12:01 AM, &quot;Tod Brown via Ti=
gers&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]">[email-masked]=
et</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"=
 style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
 =20

   =20
 =20
  <div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" text=3D"#000000">
    <font face=3D"Arial"><font face=3D"Arial">W</font>hether a Tiger was
      designated a 1967 or 1966 model was a decis<font face=3D"Arial">ion
        usually left up to<br>
        <font face=3D"Arial">the DMV in the state where the car was sold.
          My Tiger, for example, which I bought on<br>
          <font face=3D"Arial">October 15, 1966 <font face=3D"Arial">in NY
              state, was registered as a 67. Its seri<font face=3D"Arial">a=
l
                no. is B382002384LRXFE.<br>
                <font face=3D"Arial">Its birthday, IIRC, was actually
                  August 29, 1966 according to the info f<font face=3D"Aria=
l">rom Norm.</font></font><br>
                <font face=3D"Arial">I have seen <font face=3D"Arial">other
                    Tigers<font face=3D"Arial"> with later serial numbers
                      which are registered as 66&#39;s, so there<br>
                      <font face=3D"Arial">is little rhyme nor reason. <br>
                        <br>
                        <font face=3D"Arial">As others have noted, MkIA
                          manufacture ended in late 1966. Interestingly,
                          fro<font face=3D"Arial">m what<br>
                            <font face=3D"Arial">I have seen, MkII cars w<f=
ont face=3D"Arial">ere being produced before
                                MkIA production ceased, so there<br>
                                <font face=3D"Arial">was some overlap. To
                                  my knowledge (and I am not inf<font face=
=3D"Arial">allib<font face=3D"Arial">le,
                                      as my wife ofte<font face=3D"Arial">n
                                        points out)<br>
                                        <font face=3D"Arial">all of the
                                          MkII&#39;s that came to the state=
s
                                          we<font face=3D"Arial">re
                                            registered as 67&#39;s, even
                                            though a few of<br>
                                            <font face=3D"Arial">them may
                                              have been produced in
                                              1966.<br>
                                              <br>
                                              <font face=3D"Arial">Tod
                                                Brown<br>
                                                <font face=3D"Arial">B38200=
2384LRXFE<br>
                                                  <font face=3D"Arial">TAC
                                                    864</font><br>
                                                </font></font></font></font=
></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></fo=
nt></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font>
  </div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]">[email-masked]</a><br>
<br>
et=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/donate.html</a><br>
Archive: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/archive" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=
=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/archive</a><br>
Forums: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/forums" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D=
"_blank">http://www.team.net/forums</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href=3D"http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/sabre2=
[email-masked]" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://autox.team.net/m=
ailman/options/tigers/[email-masked]</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br></blockquote></div>

--001a1140501e220a4c0537ab7ec2--

--===============3831245923401343212==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________

[email-masked]

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/[email-masked]

--===============3831245923401343212==--

---

From: Gary Winblad via Tigers <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:05:54 -0700

I remember meeting a guy by the side of the road in 1971..
He told me his MKII and several more he knew of were registered as 
1968's (in California).
Gary

On 7/14/2016 3:28 PM, Tod Brown via Tigers wrote:
> To my knowledge (and I am not infallible, as my wife often points out)
> all of the MkII's that came to the states were registered as 67's, 
> even though a few of

[email-masked]