Subject: [Tigers] Stock 260 Engine Maximum Cam Lift

From: Rob Hogan via Tigers <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:17:46 -0400

--===============7595642077128089633==

--001a114357ea24041505311f3c0c

Does anyone have experience using a hydraulic lifter camshaft with a lift
greater than 0.440 (Clymer book page 41 maximum) in the flat top piston
stock 260 cu. in. engine?

Even with the original 1.67" intake valves, a 0.010 deck height and a 0.040
thick head gasket, I don't comprehend where a 0.070" minimum valve to
piston clearance is possible.

Rob Hogan

--001a114357ea24041505311f3c0c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:verdana,=
sans-serif;font-size:large">Does anyone have experience using a hydraulic l=
ifter camshaft with a lift greater than 0.440 (Clymer book page 41 maximum)=
 in the flat top piston stock 260 cu. in. engine?</div><div class=3D"gmail_=
default" style=3D"font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div=
><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-=
size:large">Even with the original 1.67&quot; intake valves, a 0.010 deck h=
eight and a 0.040 thick head gasket, I don&#39;t comprehend where a 0.070&q=
uot; minimum valve to piston clearance is possible.</div><div class=3D"gmai=
l_default" style=3D"font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></d=
iv><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:verdana,sans-serif;fon=
t-size:large">=C2=A0=C2=A0</div><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><div di=
r=3D"ltr">Rob Hogan<br></div></div></div>
</div>

--001a114357ea24041505311f3c0c--

--===============7595642077128089633==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________

[email-masked]

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/[email-masked]

--===============7595642077128089633==--