triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] slightly higher sitting nut?

To: "Wbeech@flash.net" <wbeech@flash.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] slightly higher sitting nut?
From: Paul Dorsey <dorpaul1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 09:39:45 -0400
Cc: "Triumph list Team.net" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <CAFU8DPu2Tr0Vgdecys9pOHExOnGpEs3eKkGotM-5S5P5nJPfTw@mail.gmail.com> <4A030822-157D-4324-A241-1AF7F566C37C@flash.net>
--===============0529697195244126684==

--000000000000bf600e0576b23d70
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks!What do you think the torque value might be?
Thanks, Paul

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:13 PM Wbeech@flash.net <wbeech@flash.net> wrote:

> No worries.  As long as all four are equally tight/torqued you=E2=80=99re=
 OK.
> Quite possibly that stud is longer or just not threaded as far into the
> head.
> Bill
>
> Sent from my Handspring Treo
>
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 7:38 PM, Paul Dorsey <dorpaul1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It doesn't really bother me, but I've noticed something odd about my
> engine;  Of course there are four 9/16" nuts holding the rocker arm to th=
e
> head.  Initially all 4 nuts were tight, however, nut #4 (rear nut) was tw=
o
> or three threads higher on it's stud.  It's okay that it's higher, right?
> In time, I intend on finding the torque value for all four nuts.  Is this
> listed in the workshop manual?
>
> Thanks, Paul Dorsey
> ** triumphs@autox.team.net **
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs
> http://www.team.net/archive
>
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/wbeech@flash.net
>
>

--000000000000bf600e0576b23d70
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>Thanks!What do you think the torque value might be?</div><div>Thanks, =
Paul</div><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, Sep =
24, 2018 at 10:13 PM <a href=3D"mailto:Wbeech@flash.net";>Wbeech@flash.net</=
a> &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wbeech@flash.net";>wbeech@flash.net</a>&gt; wrote:<=
br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">No worries.=C2=A0 As long as all fo=
ur are equally tight/torqued you=E2=80=99re OK.=C2=A0 Quite possibly that s=
tud is longer or just not threaded as far into the head. <br>
Bill<br>
<br>
Sent from my Handspring Treo<br>
<br>
On Sep 24, 2018, at 7:38 PM, Paul Dorsey &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dorpaul1@gma=
il.com" target=3D"_blank">dorpaul1@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
It doesn&#39;t really bother me, but I&#39;ve noticed something odd about m=
y engine;=C2=A0 Of course there are four 9/16&quot; nuts holding the rocker=
 arm to the head.=C2=A0 Initially all 4 nuts were tight, however, nut #4 (r=
ear nut) was two or three threads higher on it&#39;s stud.=C2=A0 It&#39;s o=
kay that it&#39;s higher, right?=C2=A0 In time, I intend on finding the tor=
que value for all four nuts.=C2=A0 Is this listed in the workshop manual?<b=
r>
<br>
Thanks, Paul Dorsey<br>
** <a href=3D"mailto:triumphs@autox.team.net"; target=3D"_blank">triumphs@au=
tox.team.net</a> **<br>
<br>
et=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/donate.html</a><br>
Archive: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs"; rel=3D"noreferr=
er" target=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs</a> <a href=3D=
"http://www.team.net/archive"; rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://w=
ww.team.net/archive</a><br>
<br>
hs/wbeech@flash.net" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://autox.team=
.net/mailman/options/triumphs/wbeech@flash.net</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>

--000000000000bf600e0576b23d70--

--===============0529697195244126684==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs  http://www.team.net/archive


--===============0529697195244126684==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>