triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why no cheap convertibles

Subject: Re: Why no cheap convertibles
From: Randall Young <randallyoung@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:23:51 -0800
Cc: "[unknown]" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <200101130613_MC2-C1A8-1168@compuserve.com>
GM tried to do it just a few years back, with astoundingly poor
results.  Anyone remember the Geo Metro convertible ?  Even here in fad
crazy California, with top-down weather 350 days a year, no one bought
them, in spite of fairly good reviews.

Randall

David Massey wrote:
> 
> Perhaps it's because it is cheaper to build a car with a fixed top.
> Perhaps it is because it is cheaper to build cars in larger volume and the
> market for convertibles is not big enough to attain the economies
> attainable with the fixed top version.  Perhaps the drop top crowd aren't
> interested in a chopped version of an econobox.  Perhaps it is because a
> chopped top version of an econobox won't pass the US mandated crash tests.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>