| To: | James <james.carpenter@ukaea.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Triumph Acclaim? |
| From: | Chris Rodgers <The.4.Rodgers@xtra.co.nz> |
| Date: | Sat, 07 Mar 1998 01:16:47 +1300 |
| Cc: | triumphs@Autox.Team.Net |
| References: | <199803061146.LAA09795@fuspcjcc.culham.ukaea.org.uk> <98Mar6.115605gmt.66316@gateway.ukaea.org.uk> |
> say it's not a proper triumph because it's not a sports car, > what about all the other non sports car triumphs. Herald, > Dolly etc. The dolly and herald are of excellent sporting stock - look what the factory did to them! (vitesse, sprint, and either of these will probably eat a modern civic, no probs!). Cheers, Chris (Full paid-up member of the 'Acclaim is not a real Triumph' Club) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: traitor ?, Michael D. Porter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: traitor ?<34FFF297.4D7C@rt66.com>, RICHARD.JACKSON |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Triumph Acclaim?, James |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Triumph Acclaim?, Gernot Vonhoegen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |