To: | Dan Walters <spmdr@juno.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Tigers] Wiki |
From: | michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Sep 2013 13:39:25 +1000 |
Cc: | Tiger Talk List Tiger <tigers@autox.team.net> |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | tigers@autox.team.net |
References: | <AABKDGLTXAPP6JGJ@smtpout02.vgs.untd.com> |
I just read the Tiger wiki entry.. HOLLY CRAP IS IT BAD: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunbeam_Tiger In the first intro section there are some absolute howlers: *Series II, of which only 633 were built in the final year of Tiger production, was fitted with the larger Ford 289 cu in (4.7 L) engine !! *"series I and II" Tigers as opposed to mark *The Tiger is derivative of the '53 mark alpines!! got worse as I read on.. we should really try ad sort this out.. i'm almost surmised it doesn't have that lovely urban myth that the cars were modified with sledge hammer. How can we coordinate to set this right? -- Regards Michael King _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Tigers] GOODWOOD REVIVAL, michael king |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Tigers] GOODWOOD REVIVAL, jay . laifman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Tigers] Wiki, Chris Thompson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Tigers] Wiki, Buck Trippel |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |