tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Water Pump and timing covers

To: <rab65tiger@aol.com>, <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Water Pump and timing covers
From: "A. C. Tynes" <v8tracker@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:21:28 -0500
Randy, et al,

I can't answer your specific question, but, if you are trying to save space,
there is a way to save an inch and a half in engine length.

Swapping to a late model 5.0 Explorer or '94-'95 5.0 Mustang serpentine belt
drive is supposed to give you a 27" length from the back of the block to the
front of the accessory pullies. The key elements are the timing cover, the
reverse rotation water pump and a four bolt crankshaft damper with a shorter
length serpentine pulley. 

A little fabrication would be needed to change the alternator/generator
bracket to move it back and switch it to a serpentine pulley and craft an
idler/adjustment pulley on the left side of the engine to reverse the water
pump rotation, but the parts shouldn't be too expensive. There is an
Explorer timing cover on Ebay now with an opening bid of $.99 and Buy It Now
of $15.00. It's the one you would need with a recessed area for the water
pump impeller, rather than being flat. Or you could buy the $67.95 new one!

Of course, this all assumes there is nothing to prevent using a different
crankshaft damper and pulley and I don't have a Tiger here it check that out
right now.

HTH,
A. C. Tynes
New Orleans



> -----Original Message-----
> From: tigers-bounces@autox.team.net 
> [mailto:tigers-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of rab65tiger@aol.com
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:51 PM
> To: tigers@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Tigers] Water Pump and timing covers
> 
> Does anyone know if you can swap?the thinner 289/ 302 timing 
> cover and utilize the corresponding thicker water pump with 
> the backing plate for the original thicker 260 timing pump 
> cover and the thinner water pump without backing plate (hi-po 
> style water pump).? Getting the passenger side outlet is not 
> a problem, and the different diameter on the pulley shafts do 
> not seem to be a major issue.? Curious if anyone has dobe 
> this swap, or knows what the +/- delta would be on the 
> distance from the block to the pulley face?
> 
> Randy B
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html
> 
> Tigers@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
> 
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>