Larry Daniels wrote: "I'll bet "just plain stupid" Obama (Magna Cum Laude
from Harvard) wouldn't make three mistakes like that in two sentences.
Credibility?"
I'm sorry, but from a historian's perspective, but there is absolutely no
EVIDENCE that Obama was "Magna Cum Laude from Harvard". There are only two
sources to this assertion. The first is his own autobiography, and the
second, an e-mail that began circulating in 2008, supposedly from Emily
Dupraz, a Staff Writer at the Harvard International Review, in which she
made the statement that Obama graduated magna cum laude. Neither of these
sources. Neither of these constitute "evidence" to the historian.
It has also been asserted that Obama was "editor" of the Harvard Law Review.
However, any significance pales when it is realized that there are **85-90**
"editors" of the Harvard Law Review each year.
Finally, many would have the people believe that Obama is a "genius", and
the most brilliant president in the modern era. Truth be told, based on
primary source evidence, Bush has a **demonstrably** higher IQ than Obama
(as well as a higher one than Kerry (123-120).
The bottom line is that Obama is the ONLY modern president to order ALL of
his personal records sealed. He may consider his personal records "silly",
but there are those who believe they are critical if the United States is to
have an informed electorate.
RBE
|