Subject: | [Spridgets] No LBC - Milage vs. Age |
---|---|
From: | mdrowe at optonline.net (Michael Rowe) |
Date: | Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:30:49 -0500 |
References: | <195139055.1668965.1299170875658.JavaMail.root@cl02-host03.dlls.pa.frontiernet.net> <1759326818.1669063.1299171170476.JavaMail.root@cl02-host03.dlls.pa.frontiernet.net> <20110303111997.SM04508@TOSHIBA-USER3.nosimport.com> <50FA30A13DB94DDC8BA91F973B82E610@HomePC> <AANLkTimJygWr=gHdKGO6aE-+OtaJHJ-drumZJcpRhddU@mail.gmail.com> |
My daughter needs a new used car, and has posed the following question: "wondering if you have any advice about whether it is a better deal to get a newer year car, or one with less milage. For example, looking at the Yaris, we can get a 2007 with 15k miles for about the same price as a 2009 with 45k miles. Is there a clear advantage to one over the other?" Neither of these cars is "old", and I would expect her to drive it until it costs more to repair it than it is worth (like her current car), so resale is not an issue. I have a similar question about used camper vans of much higher age and milage. What thoughts? Michael Rowe |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Spridgets] No LBC - Milage vs. Age, Michael Rowe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Spridgets] Taxes, Mark |
Previous by Thread: | [Spridgets] No LBC - Milage vs. Age, Michael Rowe |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Spridgets] No LBC - Milage vs. Age, Dave KK7SS |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |