Subject: | [Spridgets] Springfield Military Spec |
---|---|
From: | derf247 at gmail.com (derf) |
Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:14:57 -0600 |
References: | <AANLkTimRQ0Lnrj5czC=V1kOTqc-xBkVw8woJQMbEDQtj@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTineAWyJ6DYvpKz+9LBCuxV5a_0h8TVHNifhiU0b@mail.gmail.com> <4D630BF2.3090406@tx.rr.com> <AANLkTikO6otot30DjcYmr3NQHykU0U43goxwmJRoKn8J@mail.gmail.com> |
In my experience DEagle .44s are ammo finicky. I've shot a couple 44s and a 50. Ruger revolvers are more sturdily built than S&Ws. The big Rugers, like the 480 Alaskan are a hoot. The S&W 500 will loosen your teeth. I like CZs. The 75/85 series used to be bargains but now they cost as much as most other good stuff. |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Spridgets] Springfield Military Spec, derf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Spridgets] 5 speed conversion., derf |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Spridgets] Springfield Military Spec, derf |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Spridgets] Springfield Military Spec, Brad Fornal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |