To: | Michael Rowe <mdrowe@optonline.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Spridgets] Good Cranks, Bad Cranks |
From: | David Lieb <72spridget@gmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:46:11 -0500 |
> There was some discussion of which 1275 cranks are good and bad in the archives, but I can't find this answer. Vizard says early EN16T cranks were Tuftrided, and later ones (1974?) were not. How can I tell which version of EN16T I got with my 1275 bits and pieces? You KNOW you didn't get the "good" one, right? No point in worrying. _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html http://www.team.net/archive http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Spridgets] Good Cranks, Bad Cranks, Michael Rowe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Spridgets] Truck bed liner, Mark A. O'Neil |
Previous by Thread: | [Spridgets] Good Cranks, Bad Cranks, Michael Rowe |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Spridgets] Good Cranks, Bad Cranks, soavero |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |