Tim,
Thank You for the copy.
Strange comment on the data - Now i am really confused - What is the correct
aspect ratio? Why the big difference? Anyone?
"I can not explain the rather significant deviation of the calculated
speedometer calibration from the speedometers that were used in the cars. If I
use their Rolling Radius, the 165 radials and bias tires would have aspect
ratios of 77 and 74 respectively. Under that circumstance the calculated
calibration is even further away from the supplied speedometers. If I work
backward from the stock speedometers, I get an aspect ratio of 90 and 85
respectively!"
165/83-15 (RADIAL) 807 1:3.7 2985 2.5:1 1194 (1152) 3.6%
165/78-15 (BIAS) 819 1:3.7 3031 2.5:1 1212 (1184) 3.5%
Vigil
"Timothy H. Collins" <thcollin@mtu.edu> wrote:
Virgil,
Here's a copy.
Tim
At 10:20 PM 2/20/2008, you wrote:
i would like a copy -----
thanks,
Vigil
"Timothy H. Collins" <thcollin@mtu.edu> wrote:
Somewhere along the way I snagged a .PDF file titled; "Repairing
Jaeger & Smiths Speedometers" by Anthony Rhodes. It discusses the
ratio numbers (turns per mile) issue in the appendix and may be of
help. It's well written and includes pictures. Search for the doc by
the title and author or contact me for a copy.
Tim Collins
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12702006@N07/
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
You are subscribed as uniquelittlecars@yahoo.com
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Tim Collins
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12702006@N07/
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
|