dear sir,
acording to the central scrutiniser , i have violated or broken my
telefunken U-47 and am now an outlaw. i feel i must find studebaker hawk
and gather some cardboard wings and volumes of flies to get billy and ethel
back on track once more. (F.V.Z. rip good man!)
as far as catholic girls at the CYO , i'm not authorised to "go there" ,
ok? (wink-wink...nod-nod!) BUT! having owned the same darn bugeye for
over thirty rusty (and non-rusty) years , this list has offered up
interesting discussions beyond my index finger's ability to replicate!
one of the most enjoyable things wich i look forward to each day is "what's
going on with da spridgets gang" DAILY!
if you find this posting to this "THREAD" (had ta go "there") odd or wierd
, i apologise and figure you have not met me. but as for the diversity of
areas of expertise , employment , and geographical location , you are
seriously missing out , if you do not enjoy each and evry posting from the
membership! (wink-wink...nod-nod...a wink is as good as a nod to a blind
bat... *do not even go to the photographs part*.....)
chuck
you gotta have a sense of humor if you own one of these cars!
(grasshopper , thanks fer da soap box....)
> [Original Message]
> From: Ron Soave <soavero@yahoo.com>
> To: Jackson Zimmermann <jzimmerm@k12albemarle.org>;
<spridgets@autox.team.net>
> Date: 2/12/2007 10:59:18 PM
> Subject: List Tolerance (was Re: Politics vs. Actual LBC Content
>
> I do not want to start a thread, but I must comment at
> the backlash to Jackson's comments (I have not been
> keeping up to date lately due to volume, and saw the
> thread on his comments well after they were posted).
>
> I love an off topic jaunt as much as the next guy, and
> am guilty of starting more than a few. I also love a
> good technical discussion as much as the next guy, and
> am guilty of starting a few of those as well. I have a
> delete key on my keyboard if the discussions go too
> far in either direction for my tastes. However, when
> someone complains as Jackson did, respect should be
> given to that request, or at least civil disagreement
> without personal attack. A person should not be hung
> out to dry for voicing his wishes. The list has over
> 1000 members. The recent threads basically were by 1%
> of the list membership. It is wrong to think the other
> 99% necessarily enjoy our indulgences or find them
> amusing or insightful. The thing about this list that
> makes it great is the diversity, as well as the
> acceptance we have for all opinions, including those
> that may be less tolerant of such diversions. I don't
> like to see anyone bullied off the list. It isn't what
> this space is supposed to be about.
>
> Soapbox down,
|