spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: WAS: Distributor NOW: racing

To: "'Ron Soave'" <soavero@yahoo.com>, <Daniel1312@aol.com>,
Subject: RE: WAS: Distributor NOW: racing
From: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:04:43 -0500
Well, if ya think about it, they don't want cars that look vintage, yet are
over prepared underneath. 

If they consider a 1275 in a Bugeye over preparation... (car stopped
production of that style in '60, and 1275 doesn't come in til '67) then
you've done nothing to stop them.

Should a '58 Vette be able to use a 350 LT1 and just add weight? 


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Soave [mailto:soavero@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 5:19 PM
To: Daniel1312@aol.com; John.Deikis@va.gov; spridgets@autox.team.net
Cc: ladaniels@sbcglobal.net
Subject: Re: WAS: Distributor NOW: racing

That has been suggested (by me, for one).  2007
resolution is still tbd.

--- Daniel1312@aol.com wrote:

> Why doesn't the VSCDA let Frogeyes run with a 1275cc
> engine but with a weight 
> penalty (lead ballast?)
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>