To: | Glen Byrns <grbyrns@ucdavis.edu> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Emission info help- no LBC] |
Date: | Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:20:27 -0400 |
Cc: | spridgets@autox.team.net |
References: | <20040914043717.DOGB746.gx4.fuse.net@smtp.fuse.net> <098a01c49a7b$f0dbd450$6664640a@vgl.cvg.ucdavis.edu> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
Glen Byrns wrote: > Unshielded nuclear is still an > option if I can lay my hands on a few chunks of U235. Sort of like the local land fill, they always ask if the load has any asbestos? I always say no, just some nuclear waste. that is not a problem. ;) -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ Too many LBCs http://www.exit109.com/~spritenut Check out the new British Cars Forum: http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=8 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Oil requirements, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Fwd: Re: Emission info help- no LBC] 16:56:53 +0000, Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Emission info help- no LBC], Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: Emission info help- no LBC], Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |