spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [midgetsprite] Interesting, but no LBC (And NO Political content) 8

To: PilotRob@webtv.net (Robert E. Shlafer)
Subject: Re: [midgetsprite] Interesting, but no LBC (And NO Political content) 8^)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:08:18 -0500
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net (spridgets List)
References: <2247-41138BB4-2455@storefull-3132.bay.webtv.net>
umm..  I was referring to building a Spad actually..  Steve's is rotary 
engined as well, Russian rotarys.. hmm..  how does one differentiate 
between Wankel rotary and "circular" rotary engines?

Lester


On Aug 6, 2004, at 8:46 AM, Robert E. Shlafer wrote:

> Actually, Lester...
>
> The original rotary-engined Pup would be
> more of a handful than the more "normally" powered (inline-engined)
> SPAD. Pretty much like flying a heliocopter I am told. Constant
> corrections for torque affects.
>
> Fr'instance, according to the appropriate authorities, the
> shorter-coupled rotary- engined Sopwith Camel killed about as
> many pilots in training as met their deaths
> as flying this type in combat!!
>
>
>
>
> Cap'n. Bob
>      '60 :{)

Check out the new British Cars Forum:
http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=8





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>