Have to chuckle...but have to comment here
concerning the telescope. I have a local fellow
LBC'er (LBC content) here that worked on the development
of the scope. Considering there is approximately
1700+ variables to grinding a lense that big... and no way to
test it until it was in space, being off by .0001 arc seconds
on the parabola, in my eyes, is pretty damn close!
Paul Tegler
ptegler@cablespeed.com
www.teglerizer.com
----- Original Message -----
From "Robert E. Shlafer" <PilotRob at webtv.net>
To: "Frank Clarici" <spritenut@Exit109.com>
Cc: "Alex Volk" <talla@TELUSPLANET.NET>; "Kevin Valentine"
<valntine@ptd.net>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: Fuel regulator
> "They don't make things like they used to"
>
> or....lack of oversight.....quality control
> problems. Hubbell Telescope for example...now, this one was a doozey! :)
>
> Anyone watch the O'Reilly factor? :)
>
> Dennis Miller on tonight. Replays at
> 11:00PMEST. Be there or be square! :)
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets
|