spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: anti-pollution in LA LA LAND.

To: Bill L <pythias@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: anti-pollution in LA LA LAND.
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 12:25:48 -0600
Cc: Kevin Valentine <valntine@ptd.net>, spridgets@autox.team.net
References: <5731804.20030302162021@pacifier.com> <3E62A719.8010802@ptd.net> <831458298.20030303061253@pacifier.com> FILETIME=[63F73990:01C2E1B2]
Bill L wrote:

>  the nub of the isssue is that "they" can't make a retroactive law, making
> something that has already been done legally, NOW illegal, and then proceed
> with prosecution.

WRONG! Not to start a gun thread, but the Street Sweeper Shotgun, which was
LEGALLY sold in the U.S. was forced to stop production when The Prez with the
slicked willy was in office. Then you could transfer ownership of the existing
item to another through wills, in case you die. Now, even that type of transfer
is illegal.
DON"T PUT ANY LUDICROUS BEHAVOR BELOW OUR GOVERNMENT!

>
>
>        i had a friend with an "older" motorcycle. he kept it in SUPERB
>        condition, and it looked like new (a MOTO GUZI) when he bought
>        it, the law said you had to have A mirror. then they passed a
>        law mandating TWO. wouldn't you know it, when he drove thru
>        town, he got pulled over and got a ticket. but when he went to
>        court, showed his registration, etc, the ticket was thrown out.
>        that didn't stop the cop from pulling him over again (and
>        again) and issuing more tickets, EACH of which was thrown out
>        of court. in the end it was easier for him to stop driving thru
>        town. someone else may have gone ahead and and mounted the
>        second mirror, as sometimes the hassle isn't worth being proven
>        correct. ...

That was a Harrasment issue, that should have been addressed in a different
court. But that was your friends fish to fry.

>       pollution laws MAY be considered differently than safety
>        violations, but product safety laws are NOT retroactive. if you
>        have an old fan in your house without a safety housing, they
>        can't make you put one on it, NOR can you sue the manufacturer
>        if you stick your fingers into the blades. ...... IF and i say
>        IF they are to require retrofitted pollution equipment on
>        automobiles, it seems to me (i'm not a lawyer) that the burden
>        would be on the manufacturer to make such equipment available.
>        FAT CHANCE!!
>

Maybe BMW will make parts for it??

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>